shut-up-and-calculate

The contemporary ‘shut-up-and-calculate’ interpretation of quantum mechanics (as the physicist David Mermin called it) denies that physics is in the business of describing a real world, in order to avoid any literal commitment to Schrödinger’s ‘magic’.
...
The [Bell] theorem turns on Einstein’s own discovery that many phenomena in the quantum world show a kind of ‘discreteness’ not present in classical physics.
...
But he didn’t see the difference between the two proposals, apparently, and threw out the retrocausal baby with the superdeterminist bathwater.

- Taming the quantum spooks

see also Quantum ‘spookiness’ passes toughest test yet

retrocausality... hmm... why would anybody prefer it over superdeterminism? or over action-at-a-distance for that matter.

We now have two reasons for taking retrocausality seriously. First, it offers an elegant explanation of the Bell correlations...

как в анекдоте: во-первых, это красиво.