fucking amazing pardon my French“Is the Epstein case going to cause a problem [for confirmation hearings]?” Acosta had been asked. Acosta had explained, breezily, apparently, that back in the day he’d had just one meeting on the Epstein case. He’d cut the non-prosecution deal with one of Epstein’s attorneys because he had “been told” to back off, that Epstein was above his pay grade. “I was told Epstein ‘belonged to intelligence’ and to leave it alone,” he told his interviewers in the Trump transition, who evidently thought that was a sufficient answer and went ahead and hired Acosta. (The Labor Department had no comment when asked about this.)
- “I Was Told Epstein ‘Belonged to Intelligence’ And to Leave It Alone.”
see also
. Bombshell: Alex Acosta Reportedly Claimed Jeffrey Epstein "Belonged To Intelligence" - Zerohedge
. It Sure Looks Like Jeffrey Epstein Was a Spy—But Whose? - Observer
. Was Jeffrey Epstein a SPY? - Daily Mail
. Google news - About 14,300 results
see this thread on Twitter
No comments:
Post a Comment