Do we think that a problem persists even when it has become less frequent? Levari et al. show experimentally that when the “signal” a person is searching for becomes rare, the person naturally responds by broadening his or her definition of the signal—and therefore continues to find it even when it is not there.In a series of experiments, we show that people often respond to decreases in the prevalence of a stimulus by expanding their concept of it. - Prevalence-induced concept change in human judgment
Monday, September 6, 2021
Perceptual and judgment creep
Labels:
psychology
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment